Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Using the definition of Chk1 as normal or deviant did not reveal any further information about the association between the CGH and IHC data.
Similar(59)
Otherwise, if you're not a popular deviant, do not write one.
The results indicate that the passively elicited MMN to frequency and intensity deviants did not significantly vary with visual task difficulty, in spite of the fact that the easy and difficult tasks showed a wide variation in performance.
Against to our assumption, fearful deviants did not elicit larger negativity than happy deviants compared to standards.
In contrast, irrelevant deviants did not interfere with target identification when they were very different from the target.
At Pz, ERPs to fearful deviants did not differ from ERPs to standards (according to the criterion used; see Methods section), but differential ERPs between happy deviants and standards emerged at 280 ms from stimulus onset.
Yet the positive deviants do not seem to ignore the money, either.
Although the present dose of ketamine produced smaller decrements in MMN than those associated with schizophrenia, the profile of effects across deviant types did not differ between ketamine and schizophrenia.
Interestingly, patients with tumors exhibiting Chk1 expression defined as deviant clearly did not have an improved RFS when treated with tamoxifen.
As a deviant case, Portugal did not experience a worsening of AFM.
First, although the behavioral and ERP data could imply that the deviant face stimuli did not capture subjects' attention, the task was to listen to a story and press a button to the visual target and hence, the possibility could not be ruled out completely that the subjects occasionally pay attention to the emotional state of the faces.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com