Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
Full-text review was performed to determine whether the article is relevant to the study topic.
The first reviewer reviewed all retrieved articles to determine whether the article met the inclusion criteria.
Following this step, curators review all new abstracts to determine whether the article contains Arabidopsis gene-related information.
In the second round of reviewing, the full text was read to determine whether the article met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
SG then reviewed all retrieved full papers to determine whether the article met the inclusion criteria and BDF independently reviewed a random 10%% sample of full papers to check reliability (agreement level 100%%).
All search results were subsequently scanned, based on the title and abstract, to determine whether the article should be included or not, resulting in a total of 59 articles (Fig. 2).
Similar(52)
We used the article abstracts to determine whether the articles were reports of empirical social science research that examined a relationship between dress and sex and used human participants.
Two reviewers (Hsieh and Hsu) independently reviewed the articles to determine whether the articles met the predetermined eligibility criteria.
Titles, abstracts and the content of the articles were screened to determine whether the articles met the inclusion criteria.
For articles not found in any of the databases, we further searched the Cochrane Library database to determine whether the articles were included in their holdings.
Then, its algorithm determines whether the sites have relevant articles for a chosen topic.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com