Compared to the non-directional warning, the specific directional information could shorten the time spent in detecting the conflicting RLR vehicle.
If people detect the conflict and this has any functional impact on their reasoning process, they should show decreased response confidence for intuitive responses on the conflict (vs. no-conflict) problems.
In our case the number of conflict can range from 0 to 8, but even one conflict is sufficient to detect the conflict created through HGT.
(bottom left) Once the third node M is created as child of both WT1 and WT2 JC-RM detects the conflict in assigning a value to k1 in M and displays the problem as dashed connecting arrows in the graph.
Nodes in the cell store location claims with certain probabilities and detect the conflicts.
Specifically, drivers could detect the conflicting RLR vehicle most quickly in the warning timings of 4.5 s ahead of a collision.
Additionally, the results showed that female drivers were more likely to be involved with RLR collisions, and male drivers could detect the conflicting RLR vehicle more quickly than female drivers.
Numerical results for the Internode Certainty (IC) and Internode Certainty All (ICA) match perfectly the consensus networks in detecting the most conflicting regions of the three and show a gain in resolution after including RAAs (Additional file 4).
If reasoners were not detecting this conflict or the detection was merely epiphenomenal, their response confidence should not have decreased.
These 80-year-old, left-in-the-sun newspaper-brittle conflicts — where the conflicts are so ridiculously subatomic that you have to summon all the key members of CERN to detect where the conflict in this piece is.
