Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Cases without exposure setting details were excluded from the exposure setting analysis.
Even though the matching of Xpert and culture results was carefully carried out and results with insufficient details were excluded from analysis, this method is not perfect; hence there may still be minor mismatching.
Similar(58)
The role of consent to research based on publicly available material, such as that on www.twitter.com, is less clear, although previous researchers have argued that such material exists in the public domain with the proviso that prominent biographical details are excluded [ 10].
Also, studies that recorded breast-feeding results but did not report them in sufficient detail were excluded, potentially exaggerating any breast-feeding association through reporting bias.
Subjects with missing values (a few hundred for LDL and HDL in 2006, and very few for the other variables; see Tables 1 and 2 and Additional File 1 for greater detail) were excluded from data analysis.
One record from hospital A was not considered for analysis as the surgical procedure detailed was excluded from the registry.
A total of 52 women (35 [4%] pregnant and 17 [6%] non-pregnant) who replied to the initial SMS and indicated they had experienced a reaction did not provide AEFI details and were excluded from analysis.
We analysed a total of 212 studies; in detail 156 were excluded because they comprised somatic mutations, germline mutations in breast or colon cancers, molecular analyses, prophylactic gastrectomy descriptions and outdated reviews.
One hundred and seven (3.6%) who did not provide details on height and 160 (5.4%) who did not provide details on weight were excluded from analysis.
After evaluation of 14,484 citations, 20 references were evaluated in detail, and 10 were excluded.
Of these, three could be given a full code within the coding method, 158 were categorised based on the free text field and the remaining 52 had insufficient detail recorded and were excluded from the analyses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com