details were disclosed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "details were disclosed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the act of revealing or making known specific information or facts. Example: "During the meeting, several important details were disclosed about the upcoming project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

43 human-written examples

No details were disclosed.

The New York Times

No further details were disclosed.

The New York Times

No other details were disclosed.

The New York Times

No financial details were disclosed.

The New York Times

Officials said no ransom was paid, but no other details were disclosed.

The New York Times

The details were disclosed in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

17 human-written examples

And few details are disclosed about what happened to money.

The New York Times

But if the gory details are disclosed and some banks fail the test, they will face a sell-off.

The Economist

Only after that meeting, officials said, could any details be disclosed of the working understandings between Palestinians and Israel.

The New York Times

This can create mistrust and, as happened after the Edward Snowden leaks, eventual embarrassment if the details are disclosed.

The Guardian

The transaction has not been scheduled nor have details been disclosed, and it is not clear that the insurance units really have $8.5 billion to spare.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "details were disclosed" to maintain a formal and objective tone, particularly in news reports or official statements.

Common error

Avoid using "details were disclosed" excessively in your writing, as too much passive voice can make your writing sound weak or unclear. Consider rephrasing to emphasize who disclosed the details, for example, "The company disclosed the details."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "details were disclosed" functions as a passive construction used to report that specific information has been made known. This passive voice construction often emphasizes the information itself rather than who revealed it, as evidenced by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "details were disclosed" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to convey that information has been revealed. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's most frequently found in news and media contexts, maintaining a neutral and objective tone. When using this phrase, be mindful of overusing passive voice and consider active alternatives when appropriate. This phrase is suitable for formal and professional communication, particularly when the source of the information is secondary to the information itself.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

information was revealed

Focuses on the information itself being uncovered.

facts were made public

Highlights the transition of information into the public domain.

information came to light

Implies that the information was previously hidden or unknown.

revelations were made

Emphasizes the revealing of something surprising or previously unknown.

the truth was unveiled

Suggests a deliberate act of uncovering the truth.

the story was uncovered

Implies a discovering or investigation that led to the disclosure.

the particulars were shared

Focuses on the specifics of the information being communicated.

data was exposed

Suggests the vulnerability or involuntary release of information.

the circumstances were circulated

Emphasis on the spread and distribution of the information.

the specifics were communicated

Highlights the deliberate transmission of the information.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "details were disclosed" to sound more active?

You can use active alternatives such as "the company "revealed" the details", "sources "leaked" the details", or "officials "shared" the details", depending on the context.

Is "details were disclosed" formal or informal?

"Details were disclosed" tends to be more formal. For informal contexts, you might say "the details came out" or "we found out the details."

What's the difference between "details were disclosed" and "details were revealed"?

While both phrases are similar, "details were revealed" often carries a stronger connotation of uncovering something previously hidden or secret, whereas "details were disclosed" simply means the information was made known.

In what situations is it best to use "details were disclosed"?

It is best used in situations where you want to maintain objectivity and avoid assigning blame or credit, such as in news reports, legal documents, or official statements.