detailed to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "detailed to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in a context where someone is assigned or designated to a specific task or role, often in a professional or military setting. Example: "He was detailed to oversee the new project and ensure its successful completion."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

It's been well detailed to Leon why he's here.

The New York Times - Sports

It ranged from incredibly detailed to quite brief.

The Guardian - Tech

Extra police were detailed to guard the building.

The New Yorker

Twice a year, I got it detailed to shining perfection.

The New York Times

Damnation is a diagram, in which thousands of tiny figures are detailed to enact agony.

The Guardian

Kit Harington is the smoulderingly sexy young agent detailed to "bring him in".

The Guardian - Film

For several years he was the only full-time detective detailed to the case.

The New York Times

Hundreds of city cops had been detailed to the grounds, to thwart potential merrymakers.

The New Yorker

A young lady was detailed to sit beside a district leader from N. Y.

The New Yorker

Some 30 police are detailed to keep watch over him, he estimates.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

And it offers a detailed to-do list with a few deadlines for some dozen agencies.

Science Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "detailed to" when you want to emphasize a formal assignment or allocation of resources or personnel to a specific task or location.

Common error

While "detailed to" is grammatically correct, it can sound overly formal in casual conversation. In informal settings, consider using simpler alternatives like "assigned" or "asked to" for a more natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "detailed to" functions primarily as a passive verb phrase, indicating that someone or something has been assigned or instructed to perform a specific task or duty. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage is correct and common. The examples from Ludwig show it used in contexts ranging from military assignments to police details.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "detailed to" is a grammatically sound and frequently used verb phrase that signifies a formal assignment or allocation of resources. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is appropriate to use in professional, military, and official contexts. While it appears most commonly in "News & Media" and "Science", it's important to consider using alternatives like "assigned to" or "designated to" in more casual settings to avoid sounding overly formal. When using "detailed to", ensure that the context involves assigning a specific task or duty.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assigned to

Indicates a direct assignment of a task or role.

designated to

Emphasizes a formal selection or appointment for a specific purpose.

allocated to

Focuses on the distribution of resources or responsibilities.

specified to

Highlights the precise instructions or requirements given.

assigned for

Similar to "assigned to" but can sometimes imply a temporary assignment.

tasked with

Implies giving someone a specific task or duty.

charged with

Suggests a responsibility or duty has been formally given.

instructed to

Focuses on the act of giving instructions or orders.

elaborated on

Implies a more thorough explanation or description.

explained in detail

Highlights the comprehensive nature of the explanation.

FAQs

How is "detailed to" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "detailed to" is used to indicate that someone has been assigned to a specific task or duty. For example, "The officer was detailed to the security team" means the officer was assigned to that team.

What are some alternatives to using "detailed to"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "assigned to", "designated to", or "tasked with".

Is "detailed to" more formal than "assigned to"?

Yes, "detailed to" typically carries a more formal tone, often used in professional, military, or official contexts. "Assigned to" is more general and can be used in a wider range of situations.

When is it appropriate to use "detailed to" instead of "explained to"?

"Detailed to" refers to being assigned a specific task or role, whereas "explained to" refers to providing information or clarification. Use "detailed to" when someone is being assigned a duty, and "explained to" when someone is receiving an explanation.