Historically riots have been tools for intimidation; destroying populations, taking land & valuables.
It's a way to destroy population, and to show the power, to show that you are nothing, to deny the humanity.
The revolts that broke out all over Persia while Timur was away on these campaigns were repressed with ruthless vigour; whole cities were destroyed, their populations massacred, and towers built of their skulls.
Cities, towns and agricultural areas could be destroyed, and populations displaced.
Thus, with the food supply for the young salmon destroyed, their populations declined.
As a result, these geologic processes destroyed numerous populations of organisms, and produced the environmental conditions for new species of animals, plants and microbes to adapt and evolve.
By the 1920's, industrialization and overharvesting had destroyed the population, along with those of other oysters that once populated New York's waters.
In that respect, recently, Sultan-Styne et al [42], showed that contrary to the classic model where reduction in target (OB) support reduces ORN life span, when OB neurons were selectively destroyed, "sensory population was surprisingly resilient when post-synaptic neurons were depleted".
The former comprises drugs that prevent the replication and growth of coccidial populations, whereas the latter includes drugs that destroy coccidial populations.
This, in fact, is a basic prediction of the genetic drift model: small populations are destroyed by drift, large populations can tolerate it and even find it adaptive.
