Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

destroy from

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "destroy from" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not typically used in any context, as it lacks a proper grammatical structure and does not make sense. Example: "We need to destroy from the inside out" does not work as intended.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

12 human-written examples

The site is hardened, and probably beyond Israel's ability to destroy from the air.

News & Media

The New York Times

Some Iranian facilities are buried too deeply to destroy from the air.

News & Media

The New York Times

A showman, he told the country he could destroy from the inside all that voters hated about the party.

News & Media

The Economist

Gregor receives a letter he tries to destroy — from his adoptive mother, whom he has claimed was dead.

Taliban ground forces are hard to locate and destroy from the air because, in the absence of a formidable ground opponent, they can easily disperse.

News & Media

The New York Times

"There's nothing more corrosive to a society if you've got people who want to destroy from within by persecuting others because of their colour or a different ethnic background.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

Man is destroyed from within.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Man is not destroyed from the exterior.

News & Media

The New Yorker

I was pretty destroyed from that.

"What was destroyed was destroyed from the battle".

News & Media

The New York Times

Aren't I nearly destroyed from the fags myself.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing destruction or removal, prioritize verbs like "eliminate", "remove", or "eradicate" with appropriate prepositions (e.g. "eliminate from", "remove from the list"). This provides greater clarity and grammatical accuracy than using "destroy from".

Common error

Avoid using "destroy from" to indicate cause or origin. Instead of saying "The city was destroyed from the earthquake", use "destroyed by the earthquake" or "destroyed as a result of the earthquake" to clearly convey the causal relationship.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "destroy from" functions as a verb phrase, attempting to describe an action of destruction originating from a specific source or location. Ludwig AI, however, identifies it as not correct, suggesting that the grammatical structure is weak and often requires rephrasing for clarity.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Wiki

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "destroy from" is flagged by Ludwig AI as grammatically questionable and not conveying a clear meaning in written English. While it appears in some contexts, including news and general writing, its usage is infrequent and often replaceable with more precise alternatives like "destroy by", "remove from", or "eliminate from". When writing, it's advisable to avoid "destroy from" and prioritize grammatically sound alternatives to ensure clarity and accuracy. While some authoritative sources use it, its inconsistent usage and potential for misinterpretation make it a less desirable choice for formal writing.

FAQs

Is "destroy from" grammatically correct?

While sometimes encountered, "destroy from" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use alternatives like "destroy by" or rephrase the sentence for clarity.

What are some alternatives to "destroy from"?

Depending on the intended meaning, consider using phrases like "remove from", "eliminate from", or "eradicate from". These provide greater clarity and grammatical accuracy.

How can I avoid misusing "destroy from" in my writing?

Focus on using accurate prepositions with "destroy". If you mean to indicate the cause of destruction, use "destroy by". If you mean to take something away from a location, use phrases like "remove from".

When is it acceptable to use "destroy from"?

While its usage is rare and often grammatically questionable, it may appear in specific contexts where the emphasis is on the source or origin of destruction. However, clearer alternatives are usually preferable. Always consider replacing it with a more precise phrase.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: