This might be possible if some form of preferentialism is true, and if, by altering our desires, we could cease to have any interests that dying would impair.
Khrushchev may have emptily blustered in those years about burying us, but it was the Communist Chinese, in the end, who gave us enough credit to hang ourselves when our consumer society desired more than we could pay for with our own savings.
With regards to the size of the incentive, £5 in our study was adequate for achieving the desired effect but we could have offered a different amount to patients to cover any expenses incurred when completing questionnaires.
But that doesn't preclude a wistful desire that we could somehow, quantum-style, both let people go and keep them where they've so long seemed to belong.
That energy could be used for whatever purposes we desired: it could be reflected or beamed back to Earth, it could be used in-situ to build a network surrounding the Solar System, or for interstellar communications purposes.
Moreover, Kant wants pleasure in the beautiful to be open to all (so there should be no "aesthetic luck"), and if desire varied from person to person, depending on what they happen to desire, it seems that we could not require that pleasure from everyone, as the idea of universal validity requires.
First, we could desire some statistical metric that summarizes the space of all possible trade-offs as a function of the threshold (c).
Instead, we postulated that the desired response could be achieved with lanthanide complexes whose luminescence is nearly completely quenched upon intercalation in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA).
By choosing proper pairs of catholyte and anolyte, we could achieve desired cathodic and anodic migrating pH gradients in non-IPG-IEF system, effectively eliminating protein precipitation and uncertainty of quantitation existing in routine IEF and 2DE, and enhancing the resolution and sensitivity of IEF.
