Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
No longer lonely hangouts mostly populated by jet-lagged travelers, the bars and lounges at luxury hotels are now among the city's most desirable drinking destinations.
Similar(59)
Table 2 Classification of groundwater based on TDS (Davis and De Wiest 1966) TDS (mg/l) Water type % of samples <500 <span class="lh">Desirable for drinking 82 500–1,000 Permissible for drinking 14 <3,000 Useful for irrigation 4 >3,000 Unfit for drinking and irrigation –.
Davis and De Wiest (1966) classified TDS in water as follows: desirable for drinking (<500 mg/L) and permissible for <span class="lh">drinking (500 1,000 mg/L).
Water with TDS up to 500 mg/l is considered desirable for drinking, 500 1000 mg/l is permissible for drinking, up to 3000 mg/l is useful for irrigation and the greater than 3000 mg/l is unsuitable for drinking and irrigation purposes (Davis and DeWiest 1966).
According to the Davis and De Wiest (1966) (Table 2) classification of groundwater based on TDS, 82 % of the total groundwater samples are desirable for drinking (TDS < 500 mg/l), 14 % permissible for drinking (500 1,000 mg/l) and 4 % is suitable for irrigation purposes.
According to the Davis and De wiest (1966) classification of groundwater samples based on TDS, 60%% of the total groundwater samples in the study area are desirable for drinking (TDS < 500 mg/l), 23.3 % of samples are permissible for drinking (500 1000 mg/l) and 16.6 % are suitable for irrigation purposes.
The Ca2+ limit desirable for drinking water is specified as 75 mg/l (WHO 1997).
According to the above criteria, all the water samples were found desirable for drinking.
As per BIS (2003) standards, 80.8 % of the groundwater samples were desirable for drinking.
Higher percentage of the samples in pre-monsoon falls in the desirable for drinking category compared to post-monsoon season.
None of the sample falls under "desirable for drinking" category, while 75% in both the seasons are suitable for irrigation and the remaining is out of condition for drinking and irrigational uses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com