Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
The performance of different designs was compared with a commercially available axial fan.
The H2O2 sensitivity of various designs was compared, and ranged from 0 to 56 ± 4 mA cm−2 M−1.
Finally, the predictive capabilities of these small designs in giving the best metamodel fit were investigated, and also, the performance of small designs was compared with two large size standard designs.
Using a significance level of 0.05 and a risk of type II error of 0.20, the statistical power of two different designs was compared: a single biopsy design comparing the responses in two groups after the treatment; and a paired biopsy design in which individual differences (posttreatment minus baseline) were calculated before the comparison of the two groups.
In this paper, the use of parallel co-ordinate geometry (PCG) plots, principal component analysis (PCA) and N-way PCA as visualization procedures for large multi-response experimental designs was compared with the more traditional approach of calculating factor effects by multiple linear regression.
The gentleness of conventional heated capillary electrospray ionization (ESI) and the SPIN designs was compared in conjunction with the liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC MS) analysis of colominic acid and N-glycans containing sialic acid.
Similar(54)
Four different designs are compared.
Two PVA designs were compared.
Traditional and nontraditional designs are compared.
Effects of alternative designs are compared.
The existing and proposed designs were compared.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com