Sentence examples for designs for evaluating from inspiring English sources

Whilst randomised controlled trial designs have been described as the 'gold standard' [ 53] for evaluation of health interventions, there have been critiques of the sole reliance on such designs for evaluating health behaviour in a social context [ 54].

To explore designs for evaluating the prognostic and predictive value of medical tests and their effect on patient outcome.

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are considered as the gold standard in the hierarchy of research designs for evaluating the efficacy and safety of a treatment intervention.

Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard in the hierarchy of research designs for evaluating the efficacy and safety of a treatment intervention.

In regression discontinuity (RD) designs for evaluating causal effects of interventions, assignment to a treatment is determined at least partly by the value of an observed covariate lying on either side of a fixed threshold.

The classic single-arm oncology phase II trial designs for evaluating an experimental regimen/agent are limited by multiple sources of bias arising from the inability to separate trial effects (such as patient selection, trial eligibility, imaging techniques and assessment schedule, and treatment locations) from treatment effect on clinical outcomes.

The CW is an HCI technique designed for evaluating interfaces.

Randomization is the most optimal design for evaluating program-effectiveness.

KITTI dataset is designed for evaluating vision systems in a driving scenario and includes many types of data [87].

Two sessions were designed for evaluating the acoustic renditions, the first for the font style and the second for the font size.

Most of these were designed for evaluating ground shaking level related to the earthquake disaster of general houses or for seismic intensity mapping.