Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

designed to have

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "designed to have" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the purpose or intention behind the design of an object, system, or concept. Example: "The new software is designed to have a user-friendly interface that enhances productivity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They are "designed" to have children?

News & Media

The New Yorker

Today's round was designed to have fun.

"It's designed to have a bit of presence," he said.

The pupil premium is designed to have two beneficial effects.

"The process is not designed to have people do this".

News & Media

The New York Times

The building has been designed to have high visibility even at ground level.

News & Media

The New York Times

The Paperwhite is designed to have the light on all the time.

Those trips no longer have the symbolic significance that they were designed to have".

News & Media

The New York Times

The agreement was signed before, designed to have a final of Canada and the United States.

"It was designed to have a quick bite in the morning, or cocktails".

News & Media

The New York Times

"It's clearly designed to have the same effect – to suggest that they don't deserve any rights.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the intended capabilities or features of a product or system, use "designed to have" to clearly communicate the purpose behind its construction.

Common error

Avoid using "designed to have" with vague or overly general terms. Be specific about the intended functionality or attribute to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "designed to have" functions as an infinitive phrase, typically serving as an adjective modifying a noun. It indicates the intended characteristics or capabilities of something. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is grammatically sound and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

30%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "designed to have" is a versatile infinitive phrase used to specify the intended attributes or functionalities of a subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used across diverse contexts. Its frequency is classified as "very common", with notable appearances in "News & Media" and "Science". While it maintains a generally neutral register, its usage spans from formal academic writing to more casual communication. When using "designed to have", it's crucial to be specific and avoid vague language. Alternatives like "intended to have" or "engineered to have" offer similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis. In essence, "designed to have" is a valuable tool for clearly communicating the intended purpose behind the construction of a product, system, or concept.

FAQs

How can I use "designed to have" in a sentence?

Use "designed to have" to describe the intended function or characteristic of something, such as "The software is designed to have a user-friendly interface".

What is a good alternative to "designed to have"?

Alternatives include "intended to have", "meant to have", or "engineered to have", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "designed to have" or "designed for"?

"Designed to have" focuses on an intended characteristic, while "designed for" emphasizes a purpose or user. Choose the option that best aligns with your intended meaning.

What's the difference between "designed to have" and "intended to have"?

While similar, "designed to have" often implies a more technical or deliberate construction, whereas "intended to have" can suggest a broader purpose or goal.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: