Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
This randomized clinical trial conducted at 3 Veterans Affairs medical centers was designed to compare open VIH repair with the laparoscopic technique with respect to postoperative complications at 8 weeks, health-related quality of life, postoperative pain, time to return to normal activities, patient satisfaction, and recurrence rate of the hernia at 1 and 2 years.
This is the largest multicentre, prospective, RCT designed to compare open McKeown oesophagectomy with MIO McKeown oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer in China.
Similar(58)
We used a randomised controlled trial design to compare open giving of oral dihydrocodeine tartrate with open giving of sublingual buprenorphine.
This study was designed to compare an open tension-free technique (Lichtenstein repair) with a laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP).
This study was designed to compare early outcomes of open (OPEN) versus EVAR in a contemporary (2000 to 2003) large, multicenter prospective cohort.
This study was designed to compare donors who underwent open (ODN) versus retroperitonoscopic nephrectomy (RDN) in terms of intra-operative oxidative stress and recipients graft function in the early postoperative period.
This study was designed to compare the results of an open surgical technique with those of a percutaneous surgical technique for the treatment of trigger digits.
This study was designed to compare the risk and benefits of open cholecystectomy (OC) versus LC in compensated cirrhosis.
Methods: The Randomized Trial of Telephone Intervention in Chronic Heart Failure (DIAL) is a randomized, controlled, open trial designed to compare frequent telephone follow-up intervention versus control.
This is a randomized, open labeled trial designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of toremifene 120 mg to exemestane in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive mBC with disease progression after prior nsAI treatment.
Genomic maps of each phage were prepared using Phamerator [ 62], an open-source program designed to compare phage genomes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com