Sentence examples for designators are from inspiring English sources

Rigid versus non-rigid designators are specific terms for the study of reference.

Whether a statement's designators are rigid or non-rigid may determine whether it is necessarily true, necessarily false, or contingent.

But if tradition is right and these designators are actually rigid, then 'the omniscient agent = the simplest agent' is not contingently true or false.

It would appear that 'the omniscient agent = the simplest agent' has a contingently true or false secondary intension, even if tradition is right and the relevant designators are actually rigid.

He maintains that designators are rigid only with respect to a sortal: 'David' is statue-rigid, always referring to the same statue, while 'Lumpl' is lump-rigid, always referring to the same lump.

Under the JDC system, race designators are based on a purely numerical code (Kiyosawa 1984; Additional file 2: Table S2), where, for example, an isolate evoking the reaction pattern SSRSSRRRSSSS is given the designator 433.7 (1 + 2 + 10 + 20 + 400 + 0.1 + 0.2 + 0.4).

The reason is that any identity statement relating two rigid designators is necessarily true.

(Thus classical logic with nonrigid designators is possible only if we require for each singular term t that at each world w, t denotes some object in Dw).

A current listing of courses with area designators is provided on the CS departmental website. 2 additional (graduate-level) courses in Computer Science, approved by their CS advisor.

Of course, they might not be disguised descriptions that are world-indexed, too (a popular objection is discussed below in §2.3.2; for more objections, see Soames 2002, pp. 39ff).; but the point here is that so far as the thesis that names are rigid designators is concerned, the matter could go either way.

Thus the direct reference view applied to such terms says that the semantic value of those terms just is those abstract individuals, and the claim that the terms are rigid designators is the claim that they denote the same abstract individual, the same natural kind, with respect to all possible worlds.