Mathematically presented as: (n = frac{text{N}}{{1 + {text{N}}({text{e}})^{2} }}) where n = designates the sample size the research uses, N = designates total number of households in all kebeles, e = designates maximum variability or margin of error 5%% (0.05), and 1 = designates the probability of the event occurring.
Then, again using kb as unit of distance, <img src="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=info?doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0000570.e023.PNG" class= inline-graphic"/> In formula (12) the points x = inline-graphicrrespond to the TSS-5; f(x) designates the probability density function of vector integrations in T5; and g(y) designates the corresponding density function in [TSS-35, TSS-5].
A key step in probabilistic linkage is the estimation of weights to indicate the contribution of each identifier to the probability of accurately designating a pair of records from two different sources as either a match or non-match [ 27, 30, 31].
We designate p i (t) ((i=1,2,ldots,K )), as the probability of process G t) staying in state i at instant ( t ge 0 ).
We used the probability of the gene being designated ON as our prediction.
In the remainder of this paper, the term of 'membership function' will designate the actual distributions of relative frequencies and/or the ideal curves, i.e., the conditional probability density functions of the ratings.
Overall, the probability of false assignment for nestlings designated as within-pair was <0.008.
Here the numbers designate the roots of the polynomial.
Mean μ and variance σ of this distribution can be calculated as: where p i designates the co-occurrence probability of a given gene combination in publication i. N is the total number of publications.
If the probability of false assignment [ 47] based on matching loci was lower than 0.005, then nestlings were designated as within-pair nestlings.
