> -wrap-foot> aAll tests assume two degrees of freedom The power to detect the interaction effect is not influenced by the presence or absence of an environmental main effect (Design i,e) versus Design(i), and Design i,a,e) and Design(−i,a,e) versus Design i,a), Design i,a,d) and Design(−i,a)).
Consequently, for Design(i) through Design i,a,e), the main effects of the QTL deviated from zero, with effect sizes ranging from 2.5% (Design(i)) to 8.6% (Design i,a)).
Design(i = c ) represents a variation on Design(i); here the interaction effect in the heterozygotes is also assumed to be non-zero.
The G × E interaction only turned up as a main environmental effect in Design(i = c).
This makes sense, because the heterozygous group only contributes to the power to detect G × E interaction if the heterozygous interaction effect deviates from zero (Design(i = c) and not Design(i)).
Note that, irrespective of the allele frequencies, and the measurement scale of the environment, the power to detect interaction effects is higher for Design(i = c) than for Design(i).
Worst Design: I don't regret.
A-plus for lighting design, I thought.
"Why don't the buttons match?" "It's the design," I said.
But Sugimoto also appreciates American design: "I wear Gap underwear".
"I love design, I really do," she said.
