Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Several descriptive indicators of steps/day may be useful for predicting anthropometric outcome changes.
These results suggest that several descriptive indicators of steps/day may be useful for predicting changes in anthropometric outcomes in a southern US, African American, adult population.
Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, frequencies, and percentages were used to summarize demographic characteristics, descriptive indicators of steps/day, and anthropometric and clinical outcomes.
Several methodological approaches to computing descriptive indicators of steps/day were explored and included measures of central tendency, proportions, and categorical variables.
In the presence of significant covariates, various descriptive indicators of steps/day were significant predictors of changes in anthropometric (but not clinical) outcomes.
In general, meaningful differences in the magnitude of model effects for the descriptive indicators of steps/day on changes in the anthropometric outcomes were not present when using the full, truncated, or excluded datasets.
Similar(52)
We conceptualized HL as not only a measure useful for classifying patient's reading fluency, but also as a broader descriptive indicator of cognitive function including recall and critical thinking [ 22].
The usage of O serogroups as descriptive indicators for pathogenicity results in distinct phylogenetic lineages, although the isolates investigated might be polyphyletic.
We calculate descriptive indicators for each route, including an improved estimation of waiting time, transfer cost (to measure its tediousness) and consideration of the trip directness.
The objective of these descriptive indicators was to identify which clusters, i.e. groups of reasons for condemnation, were commonly seen in slaughterhouses and which ones were more specific to some slaughterhouses or periods of time.
The soil characteristics were classified in terms of the descriptive indicators (Table 1) which were interpreted on a graded scale in Table 4.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com