Sentence examples for descriptions of priority from inspiring English sources

Empirical descriptions of priority setting that focus, for example, on considerations of safety, effectiveness, and appropriateness of particular preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also insufficient.

In recent years, there have been empirical descriptions of priority setting in various contexts (e.g. waitlists [ 16- 18], hospitals [ 19- 21], and RHAs [ 13, 22]).

We have provided a description of priority setting in a hospital in a low-income country and evaluated it against the leading framework, 'accountability for reasonableness'.

Second, we have evaluated the description of priority setting in a wait time management initiative using 'accountability for reasonableness', and have identified both areas of good practice and opportunities for improvement which will be helpful to other decision-makers in comparable priority setting endeavors.

Responses to this question were analyzed so as to qualitatively identify different categories of descriptions of teachers' priorities.

For articles describing policy priorities in the health sector, we determined whether there were explicit mentions of a priority or priority setting process, declarations of specific targets related to the priority, or descriptions of who attributed the priority to the government.

This, they argue would necessitate a description of the priority setting contexts, processes and actors involved.

Items were excluded if they did not meet the following description: a description of a priority setting exercise in which a funding decision was made based on a set of explicitly-defined criteria.

By bringing these three data sets together, we tapped into a diverse and rich knowledge base and captured what we feel to be a comprehensive description of successful priority setting.

In the case of Cameroon, the underlying rationale for priority setting and its importance are well articulated but there is no sense of the process, or any description of the priorities decided upon.

These networks have demonstrated their value, judging from formal evaluations (7– 11) and based on networks' own descriptions of joint investigations of priority diseases and other activities that ranged from human and system capacity building to pandemic preparedness and regional support to a member country following a major natural disaster (12– 12).