We're just looking for an outline of what you'd like to write about, including a description of the argument you would be making, plus any details that help bring the subject to life and explain why it's important for us to cover it.
This is what licenses the capsule description of the argument as showing that induction cannot be justified or licensed either deductively or inductively; not deductively because (non-trivial) inductions do not express logically necessary connections, not inductively because that would be circular.
The most interesting thing, I think, is the description of the arguments raised by the no votes, the people who opposed even the mild easing implied by the Fed's sorta-kinda-not-really commitment to keep rates low until mid-2013.
We have conscientiously attempted to provide a neutral and comprehensive review of the existing arguments, by clearly separating the description of the arguments (see subsection 'Arguments used in the debate') from our critical appraisal of the arguments (see subsection 'Critical appraisal of the current debate').
The values of these properties are text descriptions of the Argument, the difference between them lies only in their intended use, the Caption property is intended to provide a short description of a component and the Description a longer one.
The book offers elegant, user-friendly descriptions of the arguments that persuaded Flew, arguments familiar to anyone who has heard evangelical Christians' "scientific proof" of God.
We now provide a more detailed description of these arguments in the new version of the manuscript.
Many such labels allow women's opinions and arguments to be conveniently belittled and invalidated, from the labelling of a 63-year-old politician as 'granny' to the description of an argument between two female MPs as a 'catfight'catfight
Design cases resting upon nature's alleged inability to produce some relevant 'natural' phenomenon are generally assumed to explicitly or implicitly appeal to supernatural agency, and are typically described as "God-of-the-gaps" arguments—a description usually intended to be pejorative.
Kissinger, as a student at Harvard, would write letters to his parents in the voice of the dog – "a man who not only writes letters on his dog's behalf but also brings the dog to college" hardly matches the description of a conformist, the argument goes.
This deterministic description of the world (based on rational arguments) resolves the theological problem of the contradiction between the free will of people and the foreknowledge of God.
