Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
This paper describes a comparison between our first model of a Tubular Solar Still (TSS) and a second one.
The paper describes a comparison between in situ measurements and theoretical predictions of the ground settlements induced by preloading and vertical drains on a heterogeneous soil deposit.
This article describes a comparison between a packed-sand geometric model derived from experimental digitization of a small volume of sand and from a mathematical model (Yet Another Development Engine, YADE) that produces a random packing of spherical particles.
The paper describes a comparison between numerical results and experimental data recorded within a real tunnel underlining how the developed methodology can be used as a valid design tool for any tunnel ventilation system.
The present paper describes a comparison between 177Lu complexes of two potential polyaminophosphonic acid ligands, namely Ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonic acid (EDTMP) and 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetramethylene phosphonic acid (DOTMP) with respect to their radiochemical and in-vivo biological characteristics.
This paper describes a comparison between this new LFA for bovine brucellosis and the O.I.E.
Similar(52)
Arksey and O'Malley illustrate their framework describing a comparison between programs to support carers of people with mental health problems.
In this article, we describe a comparison between cancer cells resistant to cisplatin and CSCs, both derived from the non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines H460 and A549.
This paper describes a comparison of tool life between ceramics and cubic boron nitride (CBN) cutting tools when machining hardened bearing steels using the Taguchi method.
Table 4 describes a comparison of optics post-test results between Group 1 and Group 2. The mean of Group 1 post-test is 28.74, and 16.77 for Group 2. Mean difference is 11.96 (sig. 0.000) and effect size – Cohen's d = 2.23 (strong effect).
The paper describes a first comparison between theoretical predictions and experimental findings.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com