Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
described that
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "described that" is not correct and typically not used in written English.
It is generally used incorrectly as "that" is unnecessary and does not fit well with "described." Example: "She described the situation in detail."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
56 human-written examples
In 1996, Mr. Gore described that event as "community outreach".
News & Media
Revis described that month as a whirlwind.
News & Media
Ms. Lippert described that goal another way.
News & Media
Mr. Safir described that suggestion as nonsense.
News & Media
Fara and Shaiba described that crackdown directly.
News & Media
He described that lyric as "God given".
News & Media
Commentators have described that excursion as insensitive.
News & Media
It was not described that way by the administration.
News & Media
Not that it's described that way, of course.
News & Media
Mr Galloway described that decision as a little bit galling.
News & Media
No, I've never heard her described that way either.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using "described that" in formal writing. Opt for alternatives like "stated that" or "explained that" for clearer and more grammatically correct sentences.
Common error
The word "that" is often redundant after "described." Instead of "described that", simply use "described" followed by the object being described. For example: "She described the landscape" is more concise and correct than "She described that landscape".
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "described that" functions as a verb phrase where "described" is the main verb. However, according to Ludwig AI, this phrase is generally considered grammatically incorrect due to the unnecessary use of "that".
Frequent in
News & Media
52%
Science
25%
Encyclopedias
4%
Less common in
Formal & Business
8%
Reference
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "described that" is frequently encountered in various contexts, as indicated by Ludwig. However, Ludwig AI highlights that it is generally considered grammatically incorrect due to the superfluous use of "that". Therefore, it is advisable to opt for more concise and grammatically sound alternatives such as "stated that" or "explained that". While "described that" appears across news, science, and other domains, its incorrect usage reduces its suitability for formal and professional communication. By choosing more appropriate phrasing, writers can enhance clarity and credibility.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
stated that
Replaces "described that" with a more direct and commonly accepted term for conveying information.
explained that
Suggests a more detailed and comprehensive account than simply describing.
indicated that
Implies a less explicit form of communication, hinting at something rather than stating it directly.
reported that
Conveys information received from a source, often used in journalistic contexts.
mentioned that
Suggests a brief or casual reference to something.
noted that
Highlights a specific detail or observation.
related that
Implies the telling of a story or account.
recounted that
Focuses on the act of narrating events from the past.
expressed that
Emphasizes the communication of feelings or opinions.
detailed that
Suggests an elaborate and thorough description.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "described" in a sentence?
The word "described" should be followed directly by the object or subject it refers to, without the unnecessary addition of "that". For example, "He described the painting" is grammatically sound.
Is "described that" grammatically correct?
No, "described that" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use alternatives like "stated that" or "explained that".
What can I say instead of "described that"?
Depending on the context, you can use phrases such as "stated that", "explained that", or "mentioned that".
Why is "described that" considered incorrect?
The word "that" is often redundant after "described", making the sentence unnecessarily wordy. Removing "that" improves clarity and adheres to standard grammatical conventions.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested