Taxonomic information describes classification of symbols of a knowledge representation language.
A previously described classification scheme based on density, or comonomer content, was the basis for the choice of blend components.
Both Internet Engineering Task Force IETFF) [33, 34] and International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) [35] have described classification options, indicating that classes are differentiated by three parameters: delay, delay variation (jitter) and information loss.
To analyze whether promoter regions of differentially methylated genes showed different CpG compositions, we used a recently described classification into promoters with high (HCP), intermediate (ICP) and low (LCP) CpG content [28].
Cytologic evaluation of all NAF samples was performed using previously described classification categories.
The processed matrix is finally submitted to different, previously described classification algorithms.
To assess the influence of combining different classifications, we performed an analysis restricted to studies using the above described classification.
A previously described classification system for FRAXA chromosomes established five main haplogroups (A E) based on the DXS548, FRAXAC1, and FRAXAC2 microsatellites (Table 2) [ Ennis et al., 2001].
Further research is required to validate the described classification process, and findings should be interpreted with some caution until this has been done.
The four groups of patients resulting from the previously described classification based on the compliance with the pre-planned treatment were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA or chi-square test, as appropriate.
Beyond the previously described classification, many methods have been proposed for Map sub-typing (reviewed in [ 4]); in particular, those based on the amplification of repetitive-element loci, at present, are considered the emerging Map sub-typing techniques [ 4].
