Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The value of derivatives of time delay is not necessary to be less than 1.
The corresponding constitutive laws always involve first order derivatives of time with exponential type solutions but problems in setting parameters arise when both the creep and recovery behavior have to be modeled.
It should be noted that the values of derivatives of time delays are not necessary to be less than 1 in Theorem 3.1 because the term (Phi_{22}=- 1-mu) e^{-alPhi_{22}=- 1-mue^{-alPhi_{22}=- 1-mue^{-alphatau}M_{2}-2 e^{-alphatau}K_{ e^{-alphatau}(S^{T}+S)) can be negative definite by choosing appropriate (K_{1}), (K_{2}), R, S, (M_{2}) when (mu>1).
Similar(56)
Similarly derivatives of time-out are often accompanied by the traditional crossed fingers.
Resolve the partial derivative of time on both sides of the equation.
In [3], the derivative of time delays was assumed to be less than 1.
As is well known, a large value of the derivative of time delays may yield bigger reachable set bounding.
Also it is assumed that the derivative of time delay is not necessarily zero or less than one.
The delays are assumed to be interval time-varying delays, and no restriction is imposed on the derivative of time delay.
The limitation on the derivative of time delay being less than one is relaxed and the lower bound of time-varying delay is not restricted to be zero.
It is noticed that (d_{n} = 1.5), which means that our theoretical results are suitable for the case that the derivative of time delay is bigger than 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com