Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(17)
Results: Analysis of variance showed overall differences in specimen size, histologic depth score, and diagnostic adequacy (p < 0.001).
But only behavior-2 questions have a significant higher depth score than structure questions.
As Fig. 4 shows, questions with different annotations have clearly different depth score means.
That is, behavior-2 and function questions were aggregated together as the deep group, whose mean depth score was 2.85 (SD = 0.41, n = 35), and behavior-1 and structure questions were grouped together as the shallow group, whose mean of the depth score is 2.51 (SD = 0.32, n = 43).
A nonquantitative Depth label is displayed on each dossier and EPA symbol (see Fig. 2) and is based on the quantitative depth score D as follows: 1−10 = minimal (MIN), 11 25 = moderate (MOD), 26 45 = extensive (EXT), 46 60 = exemplary (EXE).
The fact that the U.S. has strength in the breadth index places it in a good position to increase exports to many regions and thus drive up its depth score.
Similar(43)
"They don't make it easy for the star players to score goals, and that's why you need depth scoring".
Finally, a total score (S) for each EPA is calculated by simply summing the breadth and depth scores: The maximum obtainable score for each EPA is thus 100 (shown in a gold box for the example EPA in Fig. 2).
Together, the breadth and depth scores illustrate that there are significant opportunities for the U.S. to increase its global connectedness by expanding trade and investment and tapping growth in new and emerging markets.
As a measure of expression level, each TC was assigned a tag-depth score based on the maximum number of overlapping reads covering any part of the locus (Fig. 1) (see Methods).
Variants with coverage less than 6, with 'quality-by-depth' scores of less than two, with variant allele frequencies of less than 0.15, or with overall quality scores of less than 10 were discarded.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com