Sentence examples for depth of findings from inspiring English sources

After the preliminary analysis of the data, substantive theories around body weight in women were accessed to direct subsequent interviews in order to increase the depth of findings and ensure that they were theoretically grounded.

Qualitative studies were assessed using established criteria [ 13] addressing sampling, data collection, data analysis, the extent to which the study findings are grounded in the data, whether the study privileges the perspectives of participants, and the breadth and depth of findings.

It is expected that the interviews will expand on the depth of survey findings, broadening the perspective of contextual factors and their influence on tobacco use [ 50, 81].

Data were also analysed iteratively so that early results could be incorporated and probed in later interviews to increase the depth of the findings.

Combining this evidence together increased the depth of the findings and permitted a better understanding of how young people with TS and their parents feel and think about their treatment options.

Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data from the parents' survey and qualitative data from the interviews with young people was used to increase the validity and depth of the findings.

We aimed for transferability by providing characteristics of the setting and participants, reporting in-depth descriptions of findings, and using a conceptual framework.

A chronological overview of selected major milestone studies was obtained to demonstrate the development of child psychiatric epidemiology, with a more in-depth discussion of findings and methodological issues exemplified in one cohort, the Generation R Study.

We have advanced this agenda by conducting a series of focus groups with ClinSeq® participants to explore in-depth expectations of findings, positive and negative, and preferences for how results are returned.

A series of meetings convened by CG over 2012 2013 was held with all co-authors to undertake additional in-depth analysis of findings from the primary studies described above.

For this comparative analysis we chose to focus on the following criteria: description of rigour in conduct, description of study context, description of the method of analysis, and credibility and depth and richness of findings (Table 1).