depth of coverage

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "depth of coverage" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the extent or thoroughness of information provided on a particular topic or subject. Example: "The depth of coverage in this report allows readers to fully understand the complexities of the issue at hand."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The book's depth of coverage and intellectual rigor remain unrivaled.

Harvard University

But you don't get that depth of coverage on rival sites.

The Guardian - Sport

The minimum depth of coverage was 150× and 80× for tumor and normal samples, respectively.

Nature

After alignment, the mean depth of coverage was calculated to be 752× on the individual level.

Nature

depth of coverage.

Botanical Studies

Given its depth of coverage, the book provides readers with a systematic summary of aluminum neurotoxicity.

Springer

The potential depth of coverage is in the trillions of dollars.

Huffington Post

The average depth of coverage of these contigs was 8.3.

Plosone

Illumina reads, despite being much shorter, provide a higher depth of coverage than 454 reads.

Plosone

The depth of coverage was 174.7-fold 174.7-foldfold, respectively.

Plosone

The average depth of coverage achieved was 8.0-fold (Table 2).

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "depth of coverage" in scientific contexts, specify the numerical value (e.g., 100x, 500x) to provide precise information about sequencing depth.

Common error

Avoid using "depth of coverage" loosely in non-technical writing where simpler phrases like "thoroughness" or "level of detail" would be more appropriate and easily understood by a general audience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "depth of coverage" functions as a noun phrase. It commonly refers to the extent to which a subject or area is treated or studied. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "depth of coverage" is a noun phrase frequently used in scientific and technical contexts to describe the extent or thoroughness of an analysis, study, or report. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While it's most common in science and related fields, it can appear in news reporting or academic writing. Remember to be precise when using this phrase in technical settings and consider simpler alternatives like "level of detail" or "thoroughness" for broader audiences.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

extent of coverage

Replaces "depth" with "extent", focusing on the scope rather than the intensity.

level of detail

Shifts the focus to the amount of detail provided.

thoroughness of analysis

Emphasizes the completeness of the analysis performed.

intensity of investigation

Highlights the intensity with which something is investigated.

scope of examination

Focuses on the breadth of what is being examined.

comprehensiveness of the study

Highlights how complete a study is.

degree of scrutiny

Focuses on the level of rigorous examination.

breadth of understanding

Changes focus to understanding something from multiple standpoints.

intensity of focus

Highlights the concentration on a specific area.

level of immersion

Focuses on how deep or involved someone becomes with a particular topic or activity.

FAQs

How is "depth of coverage" typically measured in genomic sequencing?

In genomic sequencing, "depth of coverage" is typically measured as the average number of times a nucleotide in a genome is sequenced. It is often expressed as a numerical value followed by 'x' (e.g., 30x, 100x), indicating the average number of reads covering each base.

What does a high "depth of coverage" indicate?

A high "depth of coverage" indicates a greater confidence in the accuracy of the sequencing data. Higher coverage reduces the likelihood of false negatives and improves the ability to detect rare variants. It's similar to "thoroughness of analysis", providing a comprehensive view.

What is an alternative to using "depth of coverage" in general writing?

In general writing, you can use alternatives like "extent of coverage", "level of detail", or "thoroughness" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Why is "depth of coverage" important in diagnostic testing?

In sequencing-based diagnostic tests, adequate "depth of coverage" is essential to ensure high clinical sensitivity. Sufficient coverage is needed to accurately identify genetic variants that may be associated with disease. Lack of coverage may lead to false negative results.