Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(60)
These results are depicted in Tables 1-5.
Intragroup comparisons are depicted in Tables 2 and 3.
Using SPSS, frequencies and percentages were depicted in tables.
The technical specifications of the computing systems are depicted in Tables 1, 2, and 3.
Preoperative and intra-operative demographics are depicted in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
A comparison between the two methods is depicted in Tables 5 and 6.
The column and row weights are also depicted in Tables 1 and 2 for all rates in the standard.
Results (available upon request) referring to this period are very similar to those depicted in Tables 2 and 3.
The parameters used in the mobility model and the WLAN parameters are depicted in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.
The numerical results depicted in Tables 3 and 4 again show excellent agreement between the SRM and HAM results.
Numerical values of local Nusselt, Sherwood, and nanofluid Sherwood number are also depicted in Tables 4 and 5 for various concerned parameters.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com