Sentence examples for deontology codes from inspiring English sources

Thus deontology codes have gone from favouring the exclusion of patients from the information flow in the event of an unfavourable prognosis – something which is hardly feasible nowadays but once in line with a paternalistic view of medicine – to awarding them absolute centrality and autonomy through information and dialogue instigated by the physician [ 2].

Its avoidance is a legal obligation required by Leonetti's law and a moral duty (the French medical deontology code, version 2006, Article 37 has integrated the law's first article) [ 14].

Communication of errors and adverse events, through an open, honest and transparent approach with the patient and his/her family is, in fact, fundamental to a relationship based on the reciprocal trust and loyalty which underpins the latest code of deontology.

The code of deontology seems to confirm the need for the physician's continued intellectual efforts to first identify and evaluate the various elements of truth in question as precisely as possible, since truth is not always clearly defined within medical parameters and as regards the individual patient.

The Italian code of medical deontology recently approved stipulates that physicians have the duty to inform the patient of each unwanted event and its causes, and to identify, report and evaluate adverse events and errors.

In Italy, due to guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health and to the new code of medical deontology, the role of physicians becomes a part of a complex strategy of risk management based on a system focused approach in which increasing transparency regarding adverse outcomes and full disclosure of health- related negative events represent a key factor.

Investigators will ensure that the study is conducted in full compliance with the declaration of Helsinki and according to current legislation (Royal Decree 223/2004) and to the New Code of Medical Ethics and Deontology approved by the Spanish Royal College of Physicians.

A more plausible view of deontology is one in which deontological reasoning determines how and when consequences count (Kumm and Walen 2014).

Threshold deontology (of either stripe) is an attempt to save deontological morality from the charge of fanaticism.

Deontology is their watchword (it means the science of duty).

In fact, deontology itself is a kind of moral confabulation.