Exact(4)
Today, however, the dominant view is that the deontological understanding of justification is unsuitable for the purposes of epistemology.
For literature on the deontological understanding of justification, see essays 4 and 5 in Alston 1989, pp. 115-152, Ginet 1975, BonJour 1985 chapter 2, Feldman 1988, 2001a, Haack 2001, Plantinga 1993, Russell 2001, and Steup 1996, chapter 4. 12.
Consistent with his deontological understanding of moral obligation, as well as his realism about the moral, the effort to discover and examine moral ends by the reasoning agent is essentially an application of our mental faculties to scrutable moral problems, a mental task assigned by God.
If this answer is going to help us figure out what obligations the truth-aim imposes on us, we need to be given an account of what the correct epistemic norms are.[12] The deontological understanding of the concept of justification is common to the way philosophers such as Descartes, Locke, Moore and Chisholm have thought about justification.
Similar(56)
In this paper, the role of claims to non-serious intent with respect to (ostensibly) jocular forms of teasing amongst speakers of English are examined in order to broaden our understanding of this deontological account of intent.
This understanding of justification, commonly labeled deontological, may be defined as follows: S is justified in doing x if and only if S is not obliged to refrain from doing x.[10] What kind of obligations are relevant when we wish to assess whether a belief, rather than an action, is justified or unjustified?
See also deontological ethics.
And understanding.
Just understanding".
Understanding another".
Seek understanding.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com