Sentence examples for deny applicants from inspiring English sources

Every high school student knows the system: college admissions officers have near-magical powers to admit or deny applicants.

The G.A.O. also said Congress should consider giving the department "look-back" authority to deny applicants who transfer or hide assets in the years just before applying for pensions.

Legislation in America is not yet federal, but insurers in 18 states cannot deny applicants coverage, cancel their policies or charge higher premiums on the grounds of genetic make-up.

We reserve the right to deny applicants whose behavior while at Haas indicates they might endanger those relationships and prevent future Haas students from going on exchange to a particular school.

High school teachers who give out these grades do so knowing that for many students they'll one day be scrutinized by college admissions officers, who'll admit or deny applicants largely based on the average of these somewhat arbitrary grades that don't capture every nuance of a student's academic abilities.

Some states empower law enforcement to deny applicants who have red flags and pose a public danger; some do not.

Section 212 of the Immigration and Naturalization Act (8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens), specifies in great detail the legal grounds for denying a visa application, and denied applicants have the right to be told which subsection of the law has disqualified them.

Specifically, Autor et al. (2011) find that the SSDI determination process directly reduces the post-application employment of denied applicants by approximately 3.6 percentage points (7percentt) and allowed applicants by approximately 5.2 percentage points (33percentt).

On the other side, Bound (1989), Chen and van der Klaauw (2008), von Wachter et al. (2011), and Maestas et al. (2013) estimate the counterfactual employment rate of beneficiaries assuming the application process itself does not substantially reduce employment for denied applicants.

For a given panel, these differences in observable characteristics suggest that we would overstate the employment rate among all application groups, and understate the fractions of beneficiaries and denied applicants, since these population groups are less likely to be higher educated, married, and employed.

The leading term of this decomposition reflects the effect of the expansion of DI on employment under two premises: (1) if marginal beneficiaries would have had employment rates similar to denied applicants, had they not been receiving benefits, and (2) if the application for DI itself did not reduce the employment of denied applicants.