Sentence examples for dental morphology from inspiring English sources
Kaifu, Y. et al. Unique dental morphology of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications.
Wood, B. A. & Engleman, C. A. Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids.
Pp. 38 in T. Koppe, G. Meyer, and K.W. Alt (eds)., Comparative Dental Morphology.
Dental morphology of the Jurassic holotherian mammal, Amphitherium, with a discussion of the evolution of mammalian post-canine dental formulae.
Its primitive characteristics primarily relate to detailed aspects of dental morphology, including its relatively low-crowned teeth.
Scott, G. R., Turner, C. G. II, Townsend, G. C. & Martinón-Torres, M. The Anthropology of Modern Human Teeth: Dental Morphology and Its Variation in Recent and Fossil Homo sapiens (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2018).
To sum up, loss of function of Eda or Edar leads to different dental morphologies, presumably linked to the differences in their enamel knot morphologies.
This result is in agreement with previous findings where the analyses of species with similar diets but different dental morphologies showed comparable tooth wear [60].
Accordingly, in both the upper and lower cheek dentitions, heterozygous Edardl-J/+ mice display dental morphologies very close to WT specimens (Fig. 1A B, Fig. 2A B) whereas EdaTa/+ mice dentitions exhibit highly variable patterns (Fig. 1C G, Fig. 2I K).
Examples of such queries include: searching for extant dental morphologies that are most likely to be specialized in the same diet as a given extinct sample; finding mutant phenotypes that are most likely to be linked to a particular mutation; or simply finding the morphologies that are most similar in shape to a given query morphology.
ns = not significant The first two unrotated principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained 67.6 % of the total variance in external measurements (Fig. 3a) and 88.2 % of total variance in cranial-dental morphology (Fig. 3b).
