Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The resulting average density of the models was 0.836 g/cm3, showing a good agreement with the bulk density of linear PE (0.856 g/cm3) found in the literature[16, 20, 21].
Similar(59)
The crosslink density of the model epoxies was varied via the controlled epoxy thermoset technology and estimated experimentally.
One important question is how the packing density of the model particles compares with that of cometary particles measured in situ.
In general, FEM−based reliability analysis of engineering structures is influenced by the mesh density of the model and the accuracy of the results requires the use of a very fine mesh density in the analysis.
Soot densities can be as low as 1.57 g cm-3.[32] The lower density of the model structure may be partially an effect of the small model size because the 2732 atom model has a somewhat higher calculated density of 1.44 g cm -3.
We also examined whether the predation risk to the Model was affected by the absolute density of the Model (Dmo) or by the relative densities of the Model and Mimic (Dmo/Dmi).
Under similar circumstances, our model predicted the same: a decrease in absolute density of the Model, rather than in the relative density of Models to Mimics, raised the attack probability on the Model (Fig. 4).
The predation risk was influenced more by the absolute density of the Model (Dmo) rather than by its density relative to that of the Mimic (Dmo/Dmi) (Figs.
In our simulation, the percentage of prey items attacked (predation risk) decreased as the density of the Model increased (Fig. 5).
Moreover, the predation risk to the Model and Mimic is determined by the absolute density of the Model rather than by its density relative to that of the Mimic.
When alternative prey are abundant, as might be expected in nature, a Mimic whose value is the average of that of the predator's daily diet causes no harm to its Model; the predator's attack probability is determined mostly by the absolute density of the Model, not by its density relative to that of the Mimic.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com