Sentence examples for denominator c from inspiring English sources

The denominator, C, is in fact related to the confidence component.

For G d (in RNF), where all production weights are rational, we can determine the common denominator s of the weights of productions with premise S, as well as the common denominator c of the weights of the remaining productions (i.e., of the productions with premise B or C).

One of the miRNA-protein association networks that was consistently found across all three data sets has c-Myc as a potential underlying common denominator; c-Myc is a transcription factor for both CCNB1 [ 39] and the miR-17 family of miRNAs [ 40], which may explain this positive association and may suggest an oncogenic functional link between CCNB1, the miR-17 family and increased proliferation.

Distribute the left's denominator to c by multiplying both sides by it, to get: x^2 = cx - c, or stated in ax^2 + bx + c = y = 0 form, you get 1x^2 - cx + c = 0. a=1, b=c.

Thus, the product of all coefficients d in the factors sin d ( π 2 − θ ) in the numerator is equal to the product of all coefficients e in the factors sin e ( π 2 − θ ) in the denominator implying c = 1.

The explicit form for the correction is in rational polynomial form, parameterized with numerator and denominator coefficients c i and d i : (partiallogsigma /partiallog T _{V}~ =~ (c_{0} +c_{1}sqrt{T} +c_{2} T /(1+d_{1}sqrT}T} +d_{2} T) (13) Fig. 3 Hard sphere liquid performance.

With no loss of generality, we can divide the numerator and the denominator of C ij by the sum of the weights to obtain (Hahn, 2003).

Altogether, our results demonstrate that a specific subset of extracellular genes, including ECM genes, together with genes involved in the regulation of mineralization represent a common denominator between C-VSMCs and osteoblasts.

The denominators of C miss and C miss 2 were significantly different from each other but both estimates revealed that the genomic relationship matrix could explain more than 95% of genetic variance if sufficiently reliable phenotypes are used (with reliabilities greater than 95%).

Thus, if the denominator is | c | | c | - 1 2, g1 cannot make the frequency of sizes of predicted clusters obey a power-law distribution.

In order to achieve this goal, we first have to compute the two common denominators s and c, where s is the common denominator of the weights of productions with premise S' (i.e., of productions number 1 to 3), and c is the common denominator of the weights of the remaining productions (i.e., of productions number 4 to 73) of R Ĝ sto *.