denied of something

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "denied of something" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "deprived of something," which indicates that someone is lacking or not having something they should have. Example: "After the storm, many families were denied of basic necessities like food and water."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Traditional logic suggests that two presentations must be involved in every judgement, since a judgement is made when something is attributed or denied of something else.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

After all, by only refraining for the 40 days of Lent, we are not, like Gwyneth Paltrow not feeding her children any carbohydrates – or, like someone who is fasting to the point of starvation and endangering their life– completely denying ourselves of something.

The Guardian - Opinion

I was denied of everything.

BMC Women's Health

The problem, however, is whether marginalized people might end up being denied opportunities because of something a privileged white guy did.

The Guardian - Tech

It is worth noting this leaves England's team director in the slightly odd position of having denied doing something he has not specifically been accused of: there was no suggestion in initial reports of Flower's intentions that these feelings have been formally conveyed to the ECB.

The Guardian - Sport

To Dennett's opponents, he is simply denying the existence of something everyone knows for certain: their inner experience of sights, smells, emotions and the rest.

The Guardian

Or the plethora of local gods can be regarded as various manifestations of the One God. 2. The fact that many people have believed in Zeus does not show that they had any evidence for his existence, and there's every reason to deny the existence of something for which there is no evidence.

The New York Times

They rather deny the existence of something that is a planet, i.e., a concrete material thing.

SEP

The mistake that the skeptic makes, according to Reid, is to deny the truth of something that is demanded by our constitutions.

SEP

When we deny the existence of something, e.g., the existence of extraterrestrial life, we still accept something as true, Frege would say, namely the negative thought that there are no extraterrestrials.

SEP

Denying the existence of something because you aren't personally impacted by it.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using "denied of something", opt for "deprived of something" or "denied something" for clearer and grammatically correct phrasing. Using the correct preposition enhances readability and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "of" after "denied" when the sentence structure allows for a direct object. Saying "denied something" is more concise and grammatically sound than "denied of something".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "denied of something" functions as a verb phrase followed by a prepositional phrase. It attempts to express the idea of someone being refused or lacking something. However, as Ludwig AI suggests, this phrasing is not grammatically correct in standard English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

10%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "denied of something" attempts to convey deprivation or refusal, it is grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI indicates, the correct phrasing is typically "deprived of something" or "denied something". Although examples appear in various contexts, including news, science, and formal documents, its infrequency and grammatical issues make it a less desirable choice for clear and effective communication. For improved clarity and correctness, opting for alternative constructions like ""deprived of something"" or ""denied something"" is highly recommended.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deprived of something

This alternative uses a more grammatically standard construction, replacing "denied of" with "deprived of" to indicate a lack of something.

denied access to something

This alternative specifies that access is being denied, clarifying the nature of the deprivation.

withheld something

This alternative focuses on the act of holding something back, indicating a deliberate refusal to give.

refused something

This alternative focuses on the act of refusing to grant something, shifting the emphasis from deprivation to active denial.

prohibited from having something

This alternative emphasizes a formal prohibition, indicating that something is forbidden.

lacked something

This alternative indicates the absence of something, highlighting the deficiency rather than the act of denial.

prevented from obtaining something

This alternative focuses on the prevention of acquiring something, highlighting the obstacle.

forbidden from possessing something

This alternative uses stronger language to indicate that possessing something is not allowed.

bereft of something

This alternative indicates a significant loss or absence of something, often with emotional connotations.

stripped of something

This alternative suggests a forceful removal or deprivation of something.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "denied of something"?

A more grammatically sound alternative is "deprived of something" or "denied something". The first suggests a lack or loss, while the second indicates a refusal to grant or allow.

How can I use "deprived of something" in a sentence?

You can use "deprived of something" to indicate that someone or something is lacking something essential. For example, "The refugees were "deprived of essential supplies"."

Is "denied of" ever correct in English?

The phrase "denied of something" is generally considered incorrect in standard English. It's usually better to say ""denied something"" or use a different construction like ""deprived of something"".

What is the difference between "denied something" and "deprived of something"?

"Denied something" implies a refusal or withholding, while ""deprived of something"" suggests a loss or lack. For instance, "He was denied the promotion" means he didn't get it, whereas "He was "deprived of his freedom"" indicates he lost it.