Sentence examples for denied applicants from inspiring English sources

Section 212 of the Immigration and Naturalization Act (8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens), specifies in great detail the legal grounds for denying a visa application, and denied applicants have the right to be told which subsection of the law has disqualified them.

Specifically, Autor et al. (2011) find that the SSDI determination process directly reduces the post-application employment of denied applicants by approximately 3.6 percentage points (7percentt) and allowed applicants by approximately 5.2 percentage points (33percentt).

On the other side, Bound (1989), Chen and van der Klaauw (2008), von Wachter et al. (2011), and Maestas et al. (2013) estimate the counterfactual employment rate of beneficiaries assuming the application process itself does not substantially reduce employment for denied applicants.

For a given panel, these differences in observable characteristics suggest that we would overstate the employment rate among all application groups, and understate the fractions of beneficiaries and denied applicants, since these population groups are less likely to be higher educated, married, and employed.

The leading term of this decomposition reflects the effect of the expansion of DI on employment under two premises: (1) if marginal beneficiaries would have had employment rates similar to denied applicants, had they not been receiving benefits, and (2) if the application for DI itself did not reduce the employment of denied applicants.

A successful lawsuit changed some of these practices because they illegally denied applicants access to benefits that were not governed by state and local government.

Table 2 presents population fractions of men in the three analyzed panel-waves by age category and DI applicant status (non-applicant, beneficiary, and denied applicant).

Every high school student knows the system: college admissions officers have near-magical powers to admit or deny applicants.

Insurance companies will be barred from denying applicants because of pre-existing conditions, such as cancer and diabetes.

The G.A.O. also said Congress should consider giving the department "look-back" authority to deny applicants who transfer or hide assets in the years just before applying for pensions.

Legislation in America is not yet federal, but insurers in 18 states cannot deny applicants coverage, cancel their policies or charge higher premiums on the grounds of genetic make-up.