Sentence examples for demonstrative theory is from inspiring English sources
The Demonstrative Theory is both bold and radical.
(Reimer 1996, p. 135) The Demonstrative Theory depends on the presence of quotation marks (inasmuch as they are what get used to do the referring), so if quotation can occur without quotation marks (as in the Reimer and Washington cases), it's hard to see how the Demonstrative Theory is adequate.
One prima facie problem for demonstration-theories is that demonstratives sometimes refer in contexts in which the speaker does not produce a pointing gesture.
Thus, here as in many other philosophical questions, the analytic method, while not capable of arriving at a demonstrative result, is nevertheless capable of showing that all the positive grounds in favour of a certain theory are fallacious and that a less unnatural theory is capable of accounting for the facts.
Discussion of the Use/Identity Theories is not yet as extensive as discussion of the Demonstrative Theory, so there are fewer objections to report.
It is also an axiom (or axiom schema) that's pleasingly simple and requires no complicated assumptions about the surface structure of the sentence (in this respect, it has a clear edge on the Demonstrative Theory).
Deontological theories are normative theories.
And even if there is a need for the complementizer itself to function as a demonstrative, there is no need for it to be a demonstrative.
The most demonstrative example is the composite containing no filling material.
A demonstrative illustration is the artificially higher ObAUROCs for fragmented versus non-fragmented biopsies.
