Diffusion imaging may prove powerful in detecting differences in underlying disease mechanisms, with one study having already demonstrated significant differences between different underlying neurodegenerative pathologies [ 35].
The statistical analysis of SNT results demonstrated significant differences between vaccines of different manufacturers (Lab A: p = 0.0388; Lab B: p = 0.0066).
During the observation period (phase IV), these hemodynamic parameters demonstrated significant differences between ages and different target resuscitation pressures (P < 0.01), but no significant difference between sexes (P > 0.05).
Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated significant differences between NP and PA programs.
The analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences between only designs R and C (P=.031).
In the transcriptomic data, 8 of the 10 genes demonstrated significant differences between groups using Wilcoxon Rank test at a False Discovery Rate (FDR) or q < 0.05 (Fig. 1A).
One-way analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences between conditions, and the Tukey test showed significant differences (P<.05) between materials for both conditions.
Quantitative analysis of carotenoid pigments, ROS scavenging enzymes and the stress metabolite proline demonstrated significant differences between the three Acer species.
Multiple statistical analyses demonstrated significant differences between all groups and further demonstrated that betaARKct Rescue returned gene expression toward that of Normal.
Height, skeletal age, AFH, PFH, and posterior cranial base length demonstrated significant differences between the untreated and treated groups.
The mean torsional yield strengths demonstrated significant differences between 3.3, 3.8, and 4.3 mm-diameter and 5.0- and 6.0-mm-diameter implants (p < 0.01).
