Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The 'Democracy of Knowledge' refers to this overlapping relationship.
The Democracy of Knowledge, therefore, is further reaching than the earlier idea of the 'Republic of Science' (Polanyi [1962]).
As is being asserted, 'The Democracy of Knowledge, as a concept and metaphor, highlights and underscores parallel processes between political pluralism in advanced democracy, and knowledge and innovation heterogeneity and diversity in advanced economy and society.
This notion of pluralism in knowledge and innovation is also being captured by the idea of 'Democracy of Knowledge' , meaning that the pluralism in knowledge production communicates with pluralism (political pluralism) in a democracy, proposing here a co-evolution of democracy with systems of knowledge production and innovation (Carayannis and Campbell [2009], [2012], p. 55).
Similar(56)
By this, the fourth helix in the Quadruple Helix represents the perspective of the 'dimension of democracy' or the 'context of democracy' for knowledge, knowledge production, and innovation.
The Quadruple Helix also could be emphasized as the perspective that specifically brings in the dimension of democracy or the context of democracy for knowledge, knowledge production, and innovation.
This fourth helix also could be paraphrased as the dimension of democracy (knowledge democracy) or the dimension of knowledge society in the context of democracy.
The Quadruple Helix already encourages the perspective of the knowledge society, and of knowledge democracy for knowledge production and innovation.
Quadruple Helix already brings in the perspective of the knowledge society (and of knowledge democracy).
Here we see a co-development and co-evolution of democracy and knowledge production and innovation for knowledge society and knowledge democracy.
If one acknowledges that power always influences the production of knowledge, a democracy being no exception, the approach to be developed here will be productive: it includes transparency about positions and dependencies as well as cooperation, while constantly negotiating boundaries.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com