The phrase "demarcation problem" is correct and is often used in written English.
It usually refers to difficulties in determining the boundaries between different concepts or areas of knowledge. For example: The demarcation problem between art and science has been debated for centuries.
Another way to express this is that the demarcation problem has a deeper concern than that of demarcating the selection of human activities that we have for various reasons chosen to call "sciences".
Such a view need not presuppose a solution to the so-called "demarcation problem"—i.e., the problem of what demarcates genuine science from pseudo-science as long as there remain clear, pseudo-science ass of successfulongiences.
The demarcation problem is primarily the challenge of distinguishing real science from pseudoscience.
The issue of alternative medicine, especially Traditional Chinese Medicine (T.C.M ., brings fresh passion to the demarcation problem.
Alternative medicine has exploded in recent years, reawakening a philosophical problem that epistemologists call the "demarcation problem".
Along the way, we'll use these discussions as gateways into more general issues in the philosophy of science such as realism vs anti-realism, the nature of scientific laws, and the demarcation problem.
At the heart of this literature is the demarcation or boundary problem.
The problem of demarcation also plagues the paradigm case of supererogatory behavior, the so-called saintly and heroic acts.
Fleck never developed this idea, and this is unfortunate, for this could be his contribution to the solution of the problem of demarcation.
In these areas, the philosophical attempts at identifying a set of methods characteristic for scientific endeavors are closely related to the philosophy of science's classical problem of demarcation (see the entry on science and pseudo-science) and to the philosophical analysis of the social dimension of scientific knowledge and the role of science in democratic society.
The absence of paradox suggested that Popper's approach to problems of demarcation and of cognitive significance might possess substantial advantages over the alternatives.
