The judge concluded that the most serious allegations were "deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility".
The inquiry's chairman, Sir Thayne Forbes, a former high court judge, concluded in 2014 that the most serious claims were "deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility".
Some of the most serious claims brought by Iraqis were not exaggerated, but "deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility" lay behind them, Al-Sweady's investigating judge, Sir Thayne Forbes, concluded.
The chairman of the Al-Sweady inquiry, which was set up to look into the claims, called the most serious of them "deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility".
The al-Sweady inquiry – named after an Iraqi teenager killed in the battle – found that the murder allegations were "wholly without foundation and entirely the product of deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility".
The inquiry concluded in its final report in December 2014 that allegations of war crimes following the Battle of Danny Boy on 14 May 2004 in southern Iraq were based on "deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility".
It was criticised when the inquiry's 2014 report concluded the most serious allegations of war crimes following a 2004 battle in southern Iraq were based on "deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility".
Claims in the al-Sweady case that British soldiers had murdered Iraqi insurgents were described by the inquiry chairman, Sir Thayne Forbes, as "wholly without foundation and entirely the product of deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility".
"The main objectors are in fact not our tenants and we are concerned that they are causing distress through a campaign of deliberate misinformation and speculation," a spokesman said.
The disciplinary case against Shiner was brought after the Al-Sweady inquiry, set up to examine whether British soldiers tortured and murdered detainees following the battle of Danny Boy, concluded in 2014 that the most serious claims brought were "the product of deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility".
PIL represented complainants in the £31m Al-Sweady inquiry and was criticised when the inquiry's 2014 report concluded the most serious allegations of war crimes following a 2004 battle in southern Iraq were based on "deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility".
