"deliberate interference" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to refer to any kind of purposeful obstruction or hindrance. For example, "The government accused the opposition of deliberate interference in the elections process."
Pye responded that the Senate had long treated deliberate interference with witnesses "as the most serious of all possible contempts".
The failure of an event to turn out as expected is presented as evidence of some hidden hand at work, some deliberate interference.
3.03pm BST BBC complains of Middle East interference The BBC says there is intermittent – but deliberate – interference with its broadcasts to Europe and the Middle East.
On Monday, the BBC said it was suspending FM radio programming to the Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corp. because of what it called "deliberate interference" in its broadcasts.
But now it seems that world leaders may have to extend their value judgement about what is 'dangerous' to deliberate interference with the climate system.
Cheating, plagiarism, unauthorized collaboration, deliberate interference with the integrity of the work of others, fabrication or falsification of data, and other forms of academic dishonesty are considered serious offenses for which disciplinary penalties can be imposed.
First is deliberate state interference motivated by a desire to build strong national competitors.
"But there are disturbing indications that the collation process – where the votes are finally counted – may be subject to deliberate political interference".
"This deliberate electronic interference of the channel's distribution signal is just the latest in a long line of examples to block our impartial news and prevent it reaching audiences".
A statement issued today says: The BBC, together with a number of other broadcasters, is experiencing deliberate, intermittent interference to its transmissions to audiences in Europe and the Middle East.
John Kerry, the US secretary of state, and his British counterpart, Philip Hammond, said they had seen no evidence of systemic manipulation of the process but warned in a joint statement that "there are disturbing indications that the collation process – where the votes are finally counted – may be subject to deliberate political interference".
