Whilst humans impart a degree of morality into our decision making, such thinking is not possible in AI at the moment.
We evaluated the perceived degree of "morality" of 14 values relevant to medicine (n1 = 317, students and professionals) and 14 values relevant to business & finance (n2 = 247, students and professionals).
But it should be the case, for the phronimos no longer retains the degree of residual individuality which is required by the next level of morality, Ideal Morality).
A degraded level of morality.
In actual fact, our findings indicate an even stronger undermining of the psychological grounding of the principles in the common morality, because even within the same cultural frame we find that the degree of perceived morality of a value differs between social domains.
We propose that the specific manner in which the principles are taught and discussed in medicine – namely by referring to conflicts requiring a balancing of principles – may partly explain why the degree of perceived "morality" of the principles is lower compared to other moral values.
We also found that the social domain (medicine vs. business & finance) influences the degree of perceived morality of values.
Quite possibly his determination to retain this point of difference between himself and the Utopian socialists led him to disparage the importance of morality to a degree that goes beyond the call of theoretical necessity.
Questions of morality are, to some degree, questions of paying attention.
