Sentence examples for degrees of discrepancy from inspiring English sources
This is important in case there is a slight translation due to a few degrees of discrepancy between the angle of the osteotomy and the barrel plate.
In the category goodness difference (CG) pattern, two nonnative phones are assimilated into the same native category but differ in their degrees of discrepancy from the native "ideal".
In other cases, humeral lengthening has been done when there was upper limb length discrepancy of ≥ 5 cm, giving a cosmetic problem (Lee et al. 2005), but recent reports indicate that in patients with highly demanding activities such as sports and playing of musical instruments, lengthening can be considered for even lower degrees of discrepancy (McLawhorn et al. 2011).
The comparison revealed varying degrees of discrepancies particularly with regards to drilling depths, rock description, and construction details (open and cased sections, and screen placement depths).
How does the degree of discrepancy between perceived and preferred coach feedback relate to motivational climate?
This study was designed to evaluate the degree of discrepancy between BMIPP and TF at the subacute state of AMI.
The degree of discrepancy between researcher- and coach-assessed program quality increased when progressing through three domains of program quality (safe environment, supportive environment, engagement).
There were significant diurnal fluctuations in discrepancy (sub-ST ST) of TEA during sub-ST STd the degree of discrepancy correlaTEA positively with increase in the amount of REM sleep anduringeasleep the andunthef slow-wave sleep.
Most fClass 3 (uncertain) variants have a tendency toward being called damaging/deleterious/disease causing rather than benign/tolerated/not deleterious/polymorphism and the highest degree of discrepancy between VarCall and the other tools is in the fClass 1 2 (non-pathogenic and likely non-pathogenic).
This would allow the analysis of the degree of discrepancy between the students' and teachers' scores Fig. 12.
