Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
At the end of the semester, the score of the students, who used ICT at the highest degree, (Group 1) was statistically significantly higher than the score of the students who used ICT at lower degree (Group 2).
The mean marginal gap increased significantly after cementation, with the largest increase in the 6 degree group (76 μm mean).
The low degree group consisted of individuals who had education up to high school.
The high degree group consisted of those who had education more than college.
Non-physical violence was reported more frequently in the graduate degree group (84.6%) compared with the lower education groups, such as undergraduate (76.7%), community school (74.3%), vocational school (66.1%) and high school or lower (14.3%).
With respect to education level, no significant differences were found between the "No degree" group and "Bachelor" group, but both groups got significantly (p < 0.05) higher scores than the "Graduate" group.
Similar(52)
Concepts defined to require the user the attributes that are necessary for a specific query (Subject-Name, Degree, Group-Name, Subject-Type, Lecturer-Name, Program-Name, Semester and Deadline).
We defined four concepts to represent the different queries that the user can perform (Subject, Lecturers, Doctoral studies and Registration), three task-independent concepts (Affirmation, Negation and Not-Understood), and eight attributes (Subject-Name, Degree, Group-Name, Subject-Type, Lecturer-Name, Program-Name, Semester and Deadline).
Probability functions (p_{k}(n)) calculated for different degree groups.
Educational status was categorized as "low degree" and "high degree" groups.
Finally, comparison of ZF scores for the four degree groups based on degree quartiles (low, medium-low, medium-high, and high degree) using a nonparametric ANOVA showed significant differences in all three populations, as a result of higher ZF scores at the highest degree groups, according to a linear trend test on ranks (fig. 2 A C; table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com