Sentence examples for degraded on average from inspiring English sources

Sensitivity with the high efficiency nebulizer-short torch system at 85 μL/min is improved by a factor of 2.4 on average compared to the direct injection high efficiency nebulizer, while precision values (%RSD) and detection limits are generally comparable or slightly degraded (on average by a factor of 1.7), respectively.

Dodecane was also readily degraded, with an average of 48% mineralized after 90 days, whereas toluene was degraded more slowly, with an average of 27% mineralized by 90 days (Figure 4).

Under methanogenic condition, CFC-11 was degraded with an average rate nearly 37-fold.

Otherwise, when the expected rate will not improve nor degrade the average historical rate on that block, the ratio will also tend to become 1.

A local pixel-based blockiness measure which is calculated on the detected degraded regions is averaged to provide a blockiness value for the whole image.

The results demonstrate that the spectral valleys degraded the speech more significantly on average, but that their contribution to the overall degradation was only marginal, with the exception of the 12-kbps bit-rate and MFCC features.

Taken as a whole the management unit may be stable as regards carbon content, although the average level of stocking would be lower than in the original vegetation (i.e. on average it is degraded but not degrading further).

So, given any small fraction ε > 0, the value of −(log ε)/n (which is always greater than 0 when ε < 0) will eventually become smaller than EQI, provided that the degree to which the hypotheses are empirical distinct for the various observations ck does not on average degrade too much as the length n of the evidence stream increases.

Although, for some cases in room 1, the reverberation time is fairly short and the proposed method degraded performance, for other cases and on average, performance was improved by approximately 2%%.

Unlike STAT1, mappability information for NRSF and ZNF143 actually degraded the performance of NEXT-peak: on average, it decreased true-positives by 0.5% and 0.6%, a surprising result given that both NRSF and ZNF143 had large numbers of mapped tags (33.1 millions and 25.2 millions).

A detailed look into the time line of emissions reveals that, because of the high-annual GHG release and the size of the peat C pool, the equivalence point after which cumulative mineral soil C sequestration becomes counterbalanced by cumulative GHG emissions from degrading peatlands would be reached after on average 238 (140–1021) years (Fig. 3).