Sentence examples for deflection rules from inspiring English sources

In the other age groups, especially the deflection rules would also be responsible for the majority of referrals.

In this sample, however, these adapted deflection rules would lead to high percentages of referrals (table 4).

In both hospitals most children with pathology older than three years complied with the HSDScorr rule, followed by the absolute height rule and height deflection rule.

*Table 1 explains the interpretation of the simulation values The delta rules for length and weight, the slowed growth rule for length and weight, the absolute SDS rule, rules that take genetic height potential into account (parental height corrected rule and parental height deflection rule) and the combined weight and length deflection rule proved less effective (data not shown).

The sixth rule (parental height corrected rule) compares the height SDS of the child to its target height SDS in combination with a low height SDS. 7. The seventh rule (parental height deflection rule) signals whether a slowed growth for length SDS of the child moves away from the child's target height.

A growth disorder could disturb this, and a stable length SDS of this child at -1 over the first 2 years could indicate growth pathology such as CD. 8. Similarly, in the eight rule (combined weight and length deflection rule) we combined weight and length, in which a slowed growth for length occurs after a slowed growth for weight.

deflection by cantilever length using the cantilever deflection formula.

Most referrals would take place in the first 3 years (73.9%); The first height deflection referral rule (refer if length or height SDS changes more than 0.25 SD per year) would lead to most referrals (69%), followed by the second height deflection referral rule (refer if height SDS decreases by more than 1 SD) leading to another unacceptably high number of referrals (34%).

As this is a generic approach and can be used for any type of reinforcement and bond, this mechanics approach should speed up the development of new FRP products and the development of accurate design rules for deflection for these new FRP products.

After a long conference, the referees Eric Furlatt and Francois St. Laurent and the linesmen Darren Gibbs and Pierre Racicot ruled that it was a deflection and was therefore not a penalty under Rule 63.2.

Design rules for quantifying the deflection of steel reinforced RC beams and slabs are generally based on a full-interaction moment curvature (M/χ) approach that requires the flexural rigidity to be calibrated empirically.