Sentence examples for definition protects from inspiring English sources

But the people who attacked the embassy were barbarous murderers.Free speech, by definition, protects the right to say stupid or offensive things.Joss Delage Seattle  SIR – The full-blown invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq ignored the Muslim mindset, which sees military defeat as a religious affront.

The restrictiveness of our definition protects the internal validity of our analysis since any undercounting applies to both the numerator (hospitalization counts) and the denominator (population counts).

The agency has repeatedly warned both sides that hospitals and known civilian sites are, by definition, protected zones under international law.

Even in German nature reserves, which are by definition protected from the use of pesticides, there have been steep falls in insect populations because so many of the most widely used ones are persistent and prevent breeding.

Because immigration is reserved to the federal government, the 13 states that have legalized same-sex marriage (along with the District of Columbia) cannot, by definition, protect through their marriage laws same-sex couples seeking immigration benefits.

Limitations of liability by their very definition protect the wrongdoer and adversely affect the victim.

Petitioner argues that the common-law tort of unfair competition “by definition” protects property interests, Brief for Petitioner 15, and thus the TRCA “by definition” is designed to remedy and prevent deprivations of such interests in the false-advertising context.

A clear definition of protecting "national security" and "economic wellbeing", which are the current conditions that justify the use of the new powers.

With the possible exception of the western side of the Cairngorms, there are no national parks in Britain that meet the international definition: places protected mainly for their wildlife and habitats.

To sweep within the Fourteenth Amendment the elusive property interests that are “by definition” protected by unfair-competition law would violate our frequent admonition that the Due Process Clause is not merely a “font of tort law.” Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 701 (1976).

Hess says that it will be difficult for anyone to sue the administration over the policy until the government clarifies its definition of protecting free speech and outlines any consequences for universities that do not meet those criteria.