Leedy and Ormrod [2] define hypothesis as "a logical supposition, a reasonable guess, and an educated conjecture".
The lack of failing device identification led us to combine electrical and design analyses in order to define hypothesis on the failure origin.
On the whole, the inherently exploratory nature of the investigation framework introduced by this paper differs from the standard experimental procedures that rely on an a priori defined hypothesis to design a paradigm that addresses a specific cognitive process.
The alternative hypothesis for branchXsites tests of Yang, Nielson and colleagues (implemented in codeml) have fewer parameters than the unconstrained switching model implemented in fitmodel, and thus this approach may have more statistical power when one has well defined hypothesis for the branch on which switching is expected to have occurred.
The latter case would mean that more narrowly defined hypotheses reflecting the set of conditions imposed by each experiment could be true even if the original, more broadly defined, hypothesis described above were not true.
However, targeted experiments involve the absolute quantification of a small number of metabolites (around 20 or less) to test a defined hypothesis.
Based on the already known data and ideas, conditions of progene formation can only be described as an approximate scenario rather than a clearly defined hypothesis.
Although both studies aimed at tapping different levels in the mental lexicon, the present paper explicitly investigated selection effects based on a neuroanatomically defined hypothesis.
Unlike a previous analysis of the data focusing on the association between stressful life events and depressive symptoms [ 19], the aim here was not to test certain variables based on a priori defined hypothesis.
K is an important parameter which shapes the subsequent inferred sub-division of genetic structure, although it is a summary and convenience rather than a strictly defined hypothesis about the origin of a given set of individuals.
