Exact(1)
Typical responses in the TPR category included defining a fact as, 'an aspect of experience that is indisputably true' (physicist); 'something that has been proven beyond reasonable doubt' (biologist); 'a piece of knowledge/information that has been experimentally proven' (chemist).
Similar(59)
Indeed he "defines" a fact as "either the possession by anything of a quality, or the connection of anything with anything by a relation".
Physics students had less of a tendency to define a fact as TPR (43.3% as compared to 73.3% of biologists and 67.7% of chemists).
Strategic consistency is not consistently defined, a fact that is expressed by the variety of associated concepts (Lamberg et al. 2009).
A total of 76% of respondents in the youngest age category defined a fact in the TPR category as age increased the percentage of definitions of a fact as TPR reduced, with older respondents defining it as EVI.
Nearly two thirds of respondents (65.6%) equated a fact with 'truth, proven or reality' (TPR) while just under a quarter of respondents (24.3%) defined a fact as 'evidence or verified information' (EVI).
Define a scientific fact.
In fact, defining a default p-value threshold may be misleading for inexperienced users, who may consider such reference as a gold standard rather than evaluating by other approaches the degree of false calls for a given p-value.
Put together, these 2 results suggested in a subliminal way that all the large DNA viruses were in fact defining a domain distinct from the 3 established cellular domains.
The notion of betweenness, however, whilst typically thought of purely as defining a graph metric, could in fact be regarded as a model of sorts for the throughput of a segment when traffic is flowing on the equivalent street network.
Suszko defines a world as a fact such that for every situation p, it necessitates p or it necessitates the negation of p. All the situations which are necessitated by a world are possible, i.e. facts, and every fact is necessitated by some world.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com